top of page

The E-Waste Column no. 216

1 day ago
2 min read

Today, we are looking at planned new mining in the Nordics, with a particular focus on the Sakatti mining project in Finland.


🌱 Why is the EU planning to increase domestic mining?

Over the past few years, there has been a lot of discussion and debate on how Europe could meet its raw material needs, increase mineral security, and secure its strategic supply chains. Under the EU’s revised Critical Raw Materials Act, the European Commission now plans to increase the mining and extraction of a variety of metals and minerals domestically in Europe.


🌱 What interest is there to mine in the Nordics?

In August 2024, the European Investment Bank led a €150 million credit package, through the InvestEU programme, to fund the Sibanye-Stillwater’s Keliber lithium project and develop lithium production in Finland. More recently, on 23 July 2026, the European Investment Bank published a technical report titled “Challenges and solutions for mineral exploration in Europe”, which it commissioned to explore ways that Europe could “unlock its critical raw materials potential”. The report notably states that Finland and Sweden both demonstrate “that stronger exploration activity is possible in Europe”. The report also holds that there is a “significant untapped potential” for raw material extraction in both Finland and Sweden, signaling that the European Investment Bank may have plans to build out further funding packages to increase mining in the Nordics.


🌱 Will there be mining in Natura 2000 sites?

Natura 2000 sites are protected nature areas in the EU. Yet, on 25 March 2025, the underground mining project called “Sakatti”, which is located within a Natura 2000 site in Finnish Lapland, was designated as a ‘Strategic Project’ by the European Commission. Large-scale copper, nickel, and platinum extraction is now planned there. In addition to the Sakatti project, there is also mining planned through the “Penikat” project and at the “Sokli” deposit in Finland, which are both partially located in Natura 2000 sites.


🌱 Why is the mining controversial?

The planned mining in Finland is sparking societal interest and debate not only over environmental issues, but also over what domestic economic benefit it will have. The funding of mining exploration with Finnish taxpayers’ money, the Finnish government’s issuance of specific subsidies and tax benefits for mines, and the sale of Finnish mining licenses to large foreign multinational corporations, with limited local tax obligations and employees, have all been cause for public discussion in Finland.


🌱 What role do the current Finnish developments play on an EU level?

On a broader EU level, it is worth saying that the planned Sakatti mine is seen as “a test case for the EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act”. There are growing concerns that “Finland’s first licence to mine a Natura 2000 site [c]ould set a deadly precedent for EU nature protection”. The overriding of public interest and the fast tracking of a permit for the mine planned at the Viiankiaapa mire, which is “one of the last pristine “aapa mire” ecosystems in Europe”, could pave the way for “overriding the public interest to preserve nature” more broadly in Europe.



Read more about the mining developments here:

Comments


Subscribe To Our Newsletter.

Thanks for submitting!

We are critical, independent, and think for ourselves. We are not funded by big tech, mining conglomerates, or the European Union. Our work is rooted in creating a positive impact for people and the planet. Unlike many other private and public actors in the sector, we are not here to advance some hidden ulterior motive or to sell you on something that will destroy your future. Since we started out in 2022, our honest goal has always just been to educate, connect, and support society in the transition over to a more transparent, circular, and just electronics future.

 

All our written and audio content is created without the use of AI and its resulting plagiarism. We openly and honestly reference the sources we use. If you see an uncanny overlap between our work and that of others (without a direct reference being made to our work or to a content license acquired from us), it is probably safe to assume they – or the AI models they have used – have copied from us without the permission to do so. Our work is frequently stolen and its copyright ownership is often misrepresented in an illegal and disrespectful manner. While we actively pursue remedies to the theft of our intellectual property through the court of law, we have also learned to trust that our longstanding readers and users can recognize our voice and our way of thinking – even when it is masqueraded as an original thought by someone who has played no part in its creation. In case it is relevant, you can apply for a content license from us here or report a breach of our intellectual property rights here.

Download Our App

(currently in re-development)

image.png
Human-made content.jpg

Follow Us on Social Media:

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • substack grey icon

#theewastecolumn

Donate a cup of coffee or tea.

©2022-2026 by Christine Nikander

and Palsa & Pulk B.V. All rights reserved.

Text and data mining is not permitted.


General Terms & Conditions.

The E-Waste Column logo (1).jpg
bottom of page